ANOTHER attempt is being made to build on a ‘gap site’ off Mandeville Road, Weymouth.
The field, leading to what was once the Value House discount store, has seen several applications to build over recent years – varying from 90 to 36 homes.
Each has been rejected with many residents and local councillors claiming the open field is needed to separate Wyke Regis and Lanehouse.
Other objections have included the impact on the Heritage Coast, drainage and traffic concerns and the effect the extra homes would have on the ecology of the area.
The latest outline, or ‘in principal’ proposal, from Mr J.B George, is for 32 ‘affordable’ 3-bed starter homes which he hopes with find favour with local residents and Dorset Council planners.
The previous application, made last year was for 36 homes, a third of them classed as affordable.
A planning agent for Mr George say the new proposal would not be an isolated or sporadic development but would in-fill the section between the existing bungalow and new homes on the Value House site to the north-west and Mandeville Close.
The agents claim the reduced number of homes would still maintain a ‘green buffer’ between the two settlements and respect the sensitive character of the landscape.
To achieve this all of the new homes, in two rows, have been positioned backing directly on to Mandeville Close, leaving a large open space between there and the 40 homes recently completed on the former Value House site.
Said the agent: “The development will ‘square off’ the existing built form whilst respecting the open feel of the surrounding fields within the ownership of the applicant. This will ensure that the wildlife corridor will remain unaffected and that dog walkers can continue to use the land for recreational purposes.”
Early objectors to the latest proposal point out the lack of facilities in the area.
Said one: “Our schools are lowering their intakes. The roads are already inadequate for the traffic as well as safety for pedestrians. Doctors’ surgeries are at breaking point with less staff and more patients. Our local green spaces are becoming far and few! And to show NO consideration for the properties that are already existing that will have people over-looking into their houses. The wildlife have already been disturbed thanks to other building works in close proximity!”
The previous application in early 2022 led to a petition with more than 145 signatures, with objections from Chickerell Town Council, which has again objected to the latest plan.
It says the site is not within the Defined Development Boundary and claims that while the site if just outside the recognised Wildlife Corridor it will still cause significant disruption for wildlife while extra traffic along Camp Road will add to the disturbance to local residents.
Agents for the developer, Planning Base, say the site is within 500 metres of local amenities and essential services with a bus stop 200 metres away – making the site sustainable and by moving homes nearer to existing homes, less prominent than previous proposals.
The agent adds: “This smaller scheme and 100 per cent affordable scheme will ensure that there is limited visual impact to this sensitive location. Any negligible visual impact should be outweighed and offset by the contribution that the site will make to affordable housing supply locally. The proposal will ‘square off’ the existing built form and thus ensures that the open green space to the north and east of the site remains. This will ensure that the land can continue to be used recreationally by the local population and also will remain as an open backdrop when viewed from the wider landscape and seascape.”
Public comments on the application remain open until the end of December – ref 2023/05811/
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel