The husband of a jailed Insulate Britain protester from Weymouth who has gone on hunger strike says he is “terrified” for her but supports her choice.
Andy Smith, 45, said he and his wife Emma Smart, a scientist from Weymouth, discussed her stopping eating if she was jailed by the High Court for breaching an injunction.
Ben Taylor, 37, was given a longer sentence of six months “to deter (him) from committing further breaches” following submissions he made to the court.
Mr Smith, who volunteers as a climate activist full time but has not taken part in any protests with Insulate Britain, said: “She is incredibly resolute in her actions.
- READ MORE - JAILED: Insulate Britain activist from Weymouth to go on hunger strike
- READ MORE - 'Our politicians need to be statesmen and make hard choices for the future'
“I stand by her in all the decisions she makes. Morally they are in the right in this instance and she really stands by her convictions.
“She’s an incredibly passionate person who has spent her whole entire adult life trying to save wildlife and protect the environment. That’s deeply ingrained in who she is.
“That freedom to go out onto the street and protest has been taken away from her, so her going on a hunger strike in prison is another way to continue that process.
“All nine of them in court today were pretty resolute that you can sentence them, but this isn’t going to resolve the problem and people will still continue to protest.
“Obviously I’m terrified. It’s a horrible thing for her to go through but I stand by her decision to do that.”
Mr Smith said he was aware that Smart would be going on a hunger strike if she was put behind bars.
“It’s something we discuss quite frequently, the different ways we can make sacrifices to highlight injustices,” he said.
“I’m aware that she had previously talked to other people who’ve already done hunger strikes and been on hunger strikes. She’s a scientist, she’s done her research.”
He added that the sentences were less than the supporters of the group were expecting so they were “relieved”, but still felt it was a “complete injustice”.
“I completely stand with them on what they’ve done and how they’ve acted,” he said.
“I would obviously rather the judge side with them but they did break the law and then they were willing to face the consequences of breaking the law.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article